![[community profile]](http://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
...and who actually says that?
Dec. 20th, 2009 12:18 pm![[personal profile]](http://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
hebinekohimehttp://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?i
Actually, I think sorting people based on genitals or minor physiological features is pretty fucking stupid. I know I'm not comfortable with people jumping to conclusions based on what they see... so why is seeing it more given as the progressive solution for everything? UGH.
Would someone mind telling me what the caption is on about, anyway? If it's saying "not everyone can be androgynous or bisexual, and it'd be foolish to see the world that way", I don't have a problem with that. But if it's saying "accidents of genetics should trump one's own chosen image", then I can only see it as more oppression posing as insightful social commentary. I can't speak for anyone else, but PLEASE be gender-blind when you look at me.
(edited; still thinking this one over)
Actually, I think sorting people based on genitals or minor physiological features is pretty fucking stupid. I know I'm not comfortable with people jumping to conclusions based on what they see... so why is seeing it more given as the progressive solution for everything? UGH.
Would someone mind telling me what the caption is on about, anyway? If it's saying "not everyone can be androgynous or bisexual, and it'd be foolish to see the world that way", I don't have a problem with that. But if it's saying "accidents of genetics should trump one's own chosen image", then I can only see it as more oppression posing as insightful social commentary. I can't speak for anyone else, but PLEASE be gender-blind when you look at me.
(edited; still thinking this one over)
